No Tea For Me

tea party Has Low IQ
Posted by: SayNoToTea, 30. tammikuuta 2012 klo 17:45 (GMT) +4
Have you ever talked to someone on the far right and even after you explain fact over fact they just don't get it and keep spouting the same ignorant viewpoint? I watched a conversation of Skyepony with one of these people a few days ago and was amazed that she wasn't pulling her hair out after she gave factual information and instead of it being given any credibility it was the same old party line material spouted time and time again. No different than after i watched an episode of Palin's TV show where she hunted caribou and then told a friend that she is no hunter. In the episode she asked if her gun "kicked," had to have someone else load it for her, walked out of camp never firing the gun or checking her sights, she never carried her gun ant took five shots before she hit her target. It was pretty evident that while she may admire hunting and the great outdoors, she's no hunter. Try convincing my right wing friend that. No facts can dissuade him that she is the real deal, hank the hunter, great Alaskan. Well now after reading the article below it's a bit easier to understand why.


Study Suggests Low IQ, Social Conservatism, And Prejudice Go Hand In Hand
by Frances Martel | 3:51 pm, January 28th, 2012
» 515 comments
Are claims that conservatism is “anti-science” as valid as those that science is “anti-conservative?” No one has really asked or found an answer, but a new study from Brock University in Ontario will be sure to spark that very conversation. Psychologists have found that racism and general prejudice as well as social conservatism are linked to low IQ levels.

According to Live Science, the claim is not a Colbertian “reality has a well-known liberal bias claim, but one that those with low IQ levels tend to gravitate to simpler worldviews, that can lead to prejudice and adherence to a rigid mindset:

The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.
The Blaze notes that the study is very specific in indicating that it was looking for social conservatism, not economic or political conservatism, and the scientists do note that they found many exceptions to the rule on both sides, but that doesn’t mean that it won’t anger social conservatives, surely. For one, linking any school of thought to stupidity, particularly one that many adhere to who already believe they are the underdogs in the philosophical wars is not going to go over well with that group. The other issue is that, with the exception of the very in-depth methodology of the study which no casual observer will read, the explanation for how they got this conclusion– and why they didn’t check, say, economic liberalism’s relationship to low IQs instead– will lead the reader to a presumption of bias in the academics. It’s a treacherous route to take, and other scientists interviewed for the Live Science piece have taken note:

“They’ve pulled off the trifecta of controversial topics,” said Brian Nosek, a social and cognitive psychologist at the University of Virginia who was not involved in the study. “When one selects intelligence, political ideology and racism and looks at any of the relationships between those three variables, it’s bound to upset somebody.”
LiveScience has all the details of the method the study used to achieve its result.
  Permalink | A A A
The tea party Supports This Guy?
Posted by: SayNoToTea, 27. tammikuuta 2012 klo 16:12 (GMT) +4
First, it is scary to me when the far right becomes just as concerned about what the country can do for them as the far left is. It was all the way back in 1000 BC that great men started the saying "ask not what your country can do for you, but what can you do for your country."

Now on to the topic at hand. How anyone can support newt Gingrich and say they believe in limited goverment, say that they believe in a moral government, say that they want the same principles in government as our forefathers did or claim they want a government official that is not in the back pocket of lobbyists baffles me. If you support Gingrich fine, but you do, you cannot have it both ways. Newt gingrich is and has been and will continue to be the type of government official that has helped bring our nation to the level that it is today.

Newt Gingrich's Skeleton Closet: Scandals, Quotes, and Character
------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
Quotes

"We had oral sex. He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, 'I never slept with her.'" - Anne Manning (who was also married at the time.)

"We would have won in 1974 if we could have kept him out of the office, screwing her [a young volunteer] on the desk." - Dot Crews, his campaign scheduler at the time

[In the book] "Men Who Hate Women and the Women Who Love Them", [I] "found frightening pieces that related to my own life." - Newt.

"I think you can write a psychological profile of me that says I found a way to immerse my insecurities in a cause large enough to justify whatever I wanted it to." - Newt, speaking to Gail Sheehy.

"She isn't young enough or pretty enough to be the President's wife. And besides, she has cancer." - Newt, on his first wife (Jackie, his high school teacher)

"I don't want him to be president and I don't think he should be." - Newt's second wife Marianne.

"He treats me really nicely, buys me all these ices. Dolce & Gabbana, Fendi and that Donna, Karan, he be sharin' All that money got me wearin'" -- Callista? No wait, that's Fergie, "My Humps"

“She [Callista] is the single most self-centered person I’ve run into in politics—it’s all about her. They do these movies together, and she does a word count: she has to have the same number of words on camera as he does or they have to reshoot. ...And Callista did not want him to run for President. That’s why he had to buy her so much damn jewelry.” - an unnamed "former strategist." Will Rogers, Newt's ex-Iowa strategist has denied it was him.

"If the country today were to move to the left, Newt would sense it before it started happening and lead the way." - Dot Crews, his campaign scheduler throughout the 1970s.

"It doesn't matter what I do. People need to hear what I have to say. There's no one else who can say what I can say. It doesn't matter what I live." - Newt.
------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------

Adultery -- Back
Sex on the Desk - Oral Sex is More Easily Denied

Several newspapers are now reporting that Newt Gingrich is dating and basically living with Callista Bisek, a "willowy blond Congressional aide 23 years his junior." Biske, 33, has been spending nights at Gingrich's apartment near the Capitol and has her own key. In an amazing act of hypocrisy, Gingrich was apparently dating Bisek all during Clinton-Lewinsky adultery scandal, even as he proclaimed family values and bitterly criticized the President for his adultery.

Reporters and other Washington insiders have known about this relationship since 1994, even before Gingrich became Speaker of the House, but did not have any solid proof to report. In 1995, Vanity Fair magazine described Bisek as Gingrich's "frequent breakfast companion." Gingrich was married to Marianne Gingrich during all of that time, and just filed for divorce in August 1999.

Newt is apparently trying to create a new hybrid form, Christian adultery. According to MSNBC, Bisek sings in the National Shrine Choir, and Newt would often wait for her at the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, listening to her sing while he read the Bible.

This is hardly the first time Newt has cheated, either. "It was common knowledge that Newt was involved with other women during his [first] marriage to Jackie. Maybe not on the level of John Kennedy. But he had girlfriends -- some serious, some trivial." -- Dot Crews, his campaign scheduler throughout the 70s. One woman, Anne Manning, has come forward and confirmed a relationship with him during the 1976 campaign. "We had oral sex. He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, 'I never slept with her.'"

Kip Carter, his former campaign treasurer, was walking Newt's daughters back from a football game one day and cut across a driveway where he saw a car. "As I got to the car, I saw Newt in the passenger seat and one of the guys' wives with her head in his lap going up and down. Newt kind of turned and gave me this little-boy smile. Fortunately, Jackie Sue and Kathy were a lot younger and shorter then."

-- Sources

Family Values? Pressing Wife for Divorce in the Hospital -- Back

"He walked out in the spring of 1980.... By September, I went into the hospital for my third surgery. The two girls came to see me, and said, "Daddy is downstairs. Could he come up?" When he got there, he wanted to discuss the terms of the divorce while I was recovering from my surgery." - Jackie, his first wife. One of Newt's daughters from that first marriage, who is also a conservative columnist, recently disputed that story (after Newt co-authored a book with her), saying among other things that her mother Jackie had initiated the divorce and that "the tumor [removed in a surgery the day before] was benign." Of course no one knew the tumor was benign at the time, so I don't know why that is supposed to matter. And CNN recently found court documents that show that Newt did in fact initiate that divorce -- which makes him a blatant liar, too. In any case, I'm inclined to believe the wife this happened to over the account of her daughter who was a child at that time (and earns easy money from her dad today.) -- Sources

Spending Spree at Tiffany's -- Back

Newt brazenly attacks Mitt Romney as rich and out of touch -- after it came out that he owed the luxury jeweler Tiffany's between a quarter million and a half million dollars for pretty things he bought his wife. We think he bought them for his wife, anyway. If not Callista, maybe the next one. -- Sources

Lying Corporate Lobbyist -- Back

There are few things any current candidate has done more hypocritical than Newt's corporate lobbying work for the mortgage giant Freddie Mac. You see, Newt has publicly attacked Freddie Mac for years, blaming it for the 2008 housing crash. Then we found out that they paid him $1.6 million, as he went around and tried to convince Republicans to vote for Freddie Mac's favorite bills (and against regulations on them). Newt denies he was lobbying -- because his work didn't meet some technical definitions of lobbying -- and claimed, ridiculously that they paid him to be a "historian." No historian in history has earned $1.6 million.

Newt didn't report to Freddie Mac's director of history. (Spoiler alert; no company has one.) He reported to Craig Thomas, who was in charge of lobbying for them (and a registered lobbyist himself). and paid Newt $25,000 a month. On January 24, 2012, Newt finally released his contract. Guess what is not described in his services? History. In fact, Newt admits that he only talked to Freddie Mac staff for about one hour per month. At $25,000/ hour, that's a lot of history for a mortgage lender.

And Freddie Mac is not the only company Newt lobbied for. He had dozens of corporate clients who paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for his "services." He promoted his health care clients to legislators in Georgia or Florida who were considered changes in health care laws. He talked up projects that his clients IBM and HealthTrio were working on, to federal officials. He pushed for changes to Medicare that would enrich other clients of his. And one client, drug maker Novo Nordisk, described Newt's work this way in their annual report: "Such activities are often referred to as lobbying.” -- Sources



Dead-Beat Dad -- Back

The hospital visit wasn't the end of it, either. Shortly after the cancer ward visit, Newt stopped paying alimony and child support. Jackie had to take Newt to court to get money out of him, and her Baptist church needed to take up a collection to get his kids food and prevent the utilities from being cut off. He has never apologized for this or admitted it was a mistake. -- Sources

Draft Dodger -- Back

Though he relentlessly pushes military spending and talks like a bigtime hawk, Gingrich avoided the Vietnam War through a combination of student and family deferments. (He married one of his teachers at age 19.)



Problems With Women? -- Back

When Newt's first wife Jackie was still in the hospital recovering from her third cancer surgery, Newt came to her bed and -- by his own admission -- "argued" with her over the terms of the divorce that he wanted (and she didn't). Newt also graciously told one of his aides that "She isn't young enough or pretty enough to be the President's wife. And besides, she has cancer." Later it emerged that he had been having an affair with a younger woman, Marianne. But his second marriage -- to Marianne -- wasn't much smoother either. In fact it was very similar. After Marianne was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, Newt told her about an affair with a younger woman, Callista, that he had been having for six years. She says that Newt didn't ask for divorce this time -- he asked her to have an "open marriage" where he could also sleep with Callista. Marianne refused, and they divorced.

Does Newt have some kind of problem with women? He has said that he read a book called "Men Who Hate Women and the Women Who Love Them", and "found frightening pieces that related to my own life."

-- Sources



House Banking Scandal: Newt Bounced 22 Checks -- Back

Remember the House Banking scandal, where so many congressmen wrote rubber checks on government money? Newt hopes you don't, because he bounced 22 himself, which almost cost him reelection in 1992. His vote for the secret House pay raise, and the chauffeur who drove him around Washington in a Lincoln Town Car, didn't help.



Lucrative and Questionable Book Deals: Murdoch's $4.5 Million wasn't the first -- Back



The 1995 Murdoch Deal --- The 1984 Book Deal


The 1995 Murdoch Deal -- Back
Back in 1995, Newt's book scandal was pretty big news. He was offered first $2.5 million, then $4.5 million by Harper Collins, a publishing company owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also owns the Fox TV network and newspapers and TV stations around the world. Murdoch has been having problems with a complaint by NBC that Fox is a foreign owned TV network, which is against US law.

In the past, Harper Collins has offered million dollar book contracts to several conservative politicians in countries where Murdoch was having regulatory trouble, including England (Margaret Thatcher, Jeffrey Archer) and China (Deng Xiaoping's daughter). A week after the initial offer, Newt met with Rupert Murdoch - and Murdoch's legislative lobbyist - to discuss politics, including the NBC complaint. As facts about the deal were made public, and even Republicans criticized him, Gingrich decided to give up the $4.5 million advance for a still-lucrative deal based on royalties.

Gingrich's story kept changing through the controversy. First, Newt's spokesman said that Murdoch knew nothing about Gingrich and the book deal. On Friday January 13, Newt's spokesman admitted that Murdoch actually met Newt on a park bench the week before the deal was made, but didn't talk about it. He also said he knew nothing about Murdoch's lobbyist being at their meeting. The next day, he admitted the lobbyist was there, but claimed he didn't say so because no one asked.

Newt also said repeatedly that the book wasn't his idea; that a literary agent named Lynn Chu had sought him out and proposed it. After Ms. Chu said that Gingrich's associate Jeff Eisenach called her first on Newt's behalf, Eisenach and Newt's spokesman admitted that was true.

The 1984 Book Deal

Murdoch's book deal wasn't the first lucrative and controversial book deal Newt engineered. In 1983 he established a limited partnership in Atlanta called COS Limited, which pulled together about two dozen of his biggest campaign contributors to finance his book.

The former administrator of his congressional offices in Georgia, Dolores Adamson, resigned over the deal. "The manuscript was put together in the district office using office equipment," she said. "He would just come in and say 'This is what I want to do.' I would say, 'This is not ethical," but after a while he didn't listen." That office equipment, of course, was paid for by US taxpayers including you.

After these two book deals, Gingrich got smart and started his own book and movie-making operation, mostly focused on fear of Islam, which earned him and Callista (who works there too) a cool $3 million in 2010. -- Sources



GOPAC sleaze: Taxpayer subsidies for his partisan campaign course. -- Back

Newt in his poltical career was the king of using tax-payer subsidized donations for his personal and political purposes. He stooped so low as to hijack not one but two charities for poor inner city kids and use their donations for his personal goals.

GOPAC, Newt's longtime political action committee, was the centerpiece of a complex network of non-profit, and mostly tax exempt organizations that Newt has used to support himself and other conservative candidates. In an act of incredible hypocrisy, this crusader against taxes obtained taxpayer subsidies for his personal and political goals, by misusuing these tax-exempt groups.

For example, one GOPAC document said that its goal for the 1990s was "to both create and disseminate the doctrine of a majority Republican party." In another GOPAC document, titled "Key Factors in a House GOP Majority," Gingrich wrote "It is more powerful and more effective to develop a reform movement parallel to the official Republican party", instead of using the party structure, because it would get more attention and be more credible. Shortly thereafter, GOPAC paid for a television program promoting a "grassroots" movement to reform government; publicly they claimed it was nonpartisan, but private internal documents made its partisan goals clear.

After it got expensive, Gingrich transferred the program to the "Abraham Lincoln Opportunity Foundation," a tax-exempt group controlled by a GOPAC official named Bo Callaway. It had been set up years earlier to help inner city kids, which is why it was tax exempt. The group spent $260,000 on the television program in 1990. That same year, Newt started another tax-exempt group that paid poor students for reading books. He bragged of this in many a political speech. But after the first two years, most of this foundation's money went to Mel Steely, a former Gingrich aide who is now Newt's official biographer.

The best known effort was a college course (titled "Renewing American Civilization") at a small college that Gingrich nakedly used to recruit and organize conservative candidates, and to feed them his carefully constructed ideology and political slogans.

Of course, using tax-exempt educational or charitable donations for partisan purposes is illegal, and several ethics complaints were filed against Gingrich. He agreed to pay a $300,000 fine for misleading the committee during the investigation, and in the process dodged conviction on the actual charges through a combination of finessing some legal definitions, sheer self-confidence and raw political power (as Speaker of the House at the time of the complaints, he appointed the ethics committee. Furthermore, GOPAC had one ethics committee member on its roster last session, and gave money to another.)

The Ethics Committee dropped its final charges against Gingrich not long before he resigned as speaker, despite finding that Gingrich had in fact violated one rule by repeatedly using a political consultant paid by GOPAC to develop the Republican political agenda, because there was no evidence he was continuing to do so.

The IRS also started an investigation of one group, the Progress and Freedom Foundation, for violating its tax-exempt status by donating to Gingrich's college course. In the investigation, the special counsel found that these activities were "substantially motivated by partisan political goals." The IRS eventually overruled him, and found that the course "was educational and never favored or opposed a candidate for public office.'' It said the foundation ``did not intervene on behalf of candidates of the Republican Party merely by promoting'' themes in the course. This extremely narrow reading of the law basically said "so what if he used the course to recruit, organize and groom candidates; as long as they didn't say 'Vote for Jones', it wasn't partisan." Despite what Gingrich fans argue, this hardly proves his innocence. The IRS has chickened out before in political cases, notably letting the Church of Scientology completely off the hook in its investigation of that group. -- Sources



Corporate reward: $2,500/month to Newt's wife -- Back

According to the Wall Street Journal, a company hired Marianne Gingrich (Newt's wife) for $2,500 a month plus commissions in September 1994 after he announced support for a free trade zone in Israel that they are trying to build. Her "job" for Israel Export Development Co. is to find tenants for the trade zone. Gingrich's spokesman said that since her job did not involve working with the US government, there was no conflict of interest.

-- Sources

Who Owns Him? -- Back

- Sherman Adelson, a Las Vegas casino owner, and his wife have EACH given $5 million to Newt's SuperPAC just this spring. 2 checks, $10 million. By amazing coincidence, Newt's resurgence in the presidential campaign began about 10 minutes after Adelson wrote the first check. Here you have a perfect illustration of what the Citizens United campaign has meant for presidential politics.

- Rupert Murdoch (see book deal above)

- Georgia's Richards family, owners of Southwire Corporate ($1.3 billion/year)

The Richardses lent and donated money and office space to Gingrich from his earliest days in politics. They have given over $100,000, and Gingrich was the first recipient of donations from Southwire's PAC. By coincidence, Gingrich has changed from an environmentalist critic of Southwire to a staunch anti-environmentalist during that time. People with ties to Southwire were instrumental in two earlier lucrative book deals of Gingrich's in 1977 and 1984; the latter was investigated for ethical violations. -- Sources




------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------



Sources




"Jump-Start: How Speaker Gingrich Grabbed Power and Attention So Quickly", Wall Street Journal, January 19, 1995 pA1

Gingrich’s former firm releases Freddie Mac contract, by Dan Eggen, Washington Post, January 24, 2012

"The Inner Quest of Newt Gingrich", Gail Sheehy, Vanity Fair, September 1995 p147

"Tales About Gingrich make field level", Idaho Spokesman Review, August 16, 1995 pB6

"Gingrich Aided Export Firm That Employed His Wife", NY Times News Service, San Francisco Chronicle, February 7, 1995 pA7

"Gingrich, Critic of 'Business as Usual,' Helps Out Special Interests Like 'Any Member of Congress'", Phil Kuntz, Wall Street Journal, April 3, 1995 pA16



Quote Sources -- Back

Callista quote: The Good Wife: Can Callista Gingrich save her husband?, by Ariel Lev, The New Yorker, January 23, 2012

"Doesn't matter what I do" quote: John H. Richardson, "Newt Gingrich: The Indispensable Republican, " Esquire Magazine, August 10, 2010

lobbying -- January 23, 2012, 11:29 pm Tampa, Fla., Debate Fact-Check by THE NEW YORK TIMES

"Tales About Gingrich make field level", Idaho Spokesman Review, August 16, 1995 pB6

"Newt's Glass House," by Stephen Talbot, Salon.com, August 28, 1998

adulterous choir practice: "Personals", by Leah Garchik, San Francisco Chronicle, August 17, 1999 pE12



Adultery -- Back


"Gingrich Won't Answer Woman's Adultery Story," Missoula (Montana) Missoulian, August 16, 1995 page 1

"Doesn't matter what I do" quote: John H. Richardson, "Newt Gingrich: The Indispensable Republican," Esquire Magazine, August 10, 2010

Newly recovered court files cast doubt on Gingrich version of first divorce," by Alan Duke, CNN, December 27, 2011

"Newt's Glass House," by Stephen Talbot, Salon.com, August 28, 1998

"Newt Plays House With New Squeeze," by Timothy Burger and Owen Moritz, NY Daily News, August 12, 1999

"Newt's Fooling Around With His Girl On the Hill," by Andy Soltis, New York Post, August 12, 1999

"The Big One That Got Away," by David Corn, Salon Website, August 12, 1998

adulterous choir practice: "Personals", by Leah Garchik, San Francisco Chronicle, August 17, 1999 pE12

GOPAC Sleaze Sources -- Back

"Gingrich's political education", Jeff Gerth and Stephen Labaton (NY Times News Service), San Francisco Examiner, February 12, 1995 pA6

"IRS clears Gingrich donation that led to his House censure", Capitol Hill Blue Website, February 4, 1999

Ethics Committee Drops Last of 84 Charges Against Gingrich, By Curt Anderson (Associated Press), Washington Post, October 11, 1998, Page A13

"Use of Tax-Exempt Groups Integral to Political Strategy", by Charles R. Babcock, Washington Post, January 7, 1997, Page A01

"Jump-Start: How Speaker Gingrich Grabbed Power and Attention So Quickly", Wall Street Journal, January 19, 1995 pA1

Lobbyist Sources -- Back

Tampa, Fla., Debate Fact-Check by THE NEW YORK TIMES, January 23, 2012

Gingrich’s former firm releases Freddie Mac contract, by Dan Eggen, Washington Post, January 24, 2012

"Gingrich, Critic of 'Business as Usual,' Helps Out Special Interests Like 'Any Member of Congress'", Phil Kuntz, Wall Street Journal, April 3, 1995 pA16



Dead Beat Dad Sources -- Back

"The Inner Quest of Newt Gingrich", Gail Sheehy, Vanity Fair, September 1995 p147


Newly recovered court files cast doubt on Gingrich version of first divorce," By Alan Duke, CNN, December 27, 2011



$ to Wife Sources -- Back


"Gingrich Aided Export Firm That Employed His Wife", NY Times News Service, San Francisco Chronicle, February 7, 1995 pA7



Who Owns Him Sources -- Back

"Newt, Inc.", Dennis Bernstein, Bay Guardian, February 1, 1995 p19

"Gingrich, Murdoch reveal lobbyist's role at meeting", Katharine Seelye (NY Times News Service), San Francisco Examiner, pA1

"Murdoch, Gingrich Admit They Talked", San Francisco Chronicle, January 13, 1995

A Big Check, and Gingrich Gets a Big Lift, By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE and ERIC LIPTON, New York Times, January 9, 2012

Miriam Adelson Donates $5 Million to a Pro-Gingrich ‘Super PAC’, by NICHOLAS CONFESSORE, New York Times, January 23, 2012



Book Deal Sources -- Back

"Gingrich, Murdoch reveal lobbyist's role at meeting", Katharine Seelye (NY Times News Service), San Francisco Examiner, pA1

"Murdoch, Gingrich Admit They Talked", San Francisco Chronicle, January 13, 1995

"The Mysterious Mrs. Newt", Martin Fletcher (London Times News Service), SF Examiner, January 15, 1995 pA4

"Newt's Near Misses", Ron Curran, The Bay Guardian, January 11, 1995 p10

"Newt, Inc.", Dennis Bernstein, Bay Guardian, February 1, 1995 p19

  Permalink | A A A
10 Reasons tea party Is Dead
Posted by: SayNoToTea, 21. tammikuuta 2012 klo 20:55 (GMT) +4
Ten Signs the Tea Party is Dead



23
ShareWhen the Tea Party-fueled GOP took over the House by storm in January of 2010 there was high talk of huge change. Exactly a year later, there are signs that the underlying political force behind the House flipping in 2010, the Tea Party, is all but dead.

Need evidence the Tea Party is all but dead? The polls and the vote counts keep rolling in. In politics, winning and votes are what measure influence and power. When applied today, those measuring sticks reveal a weak if not dead political movement that hit its height during the summer of 2009. Today the loud “in your face” town halls are gone. More importantly: So are the candidates.

Ten Signs the Tea Party Is dead:

1. Disappearing Heroes: In 2010, Tea heroine Christine O’Donnell lost 56% to 40% to Sen. Chris Coons — then swiftly disappeared … and then endorsed Mitt Romney. What’s Sarah Palin up to now? Does her endorsement matter? Where are Joe Miller and Sharron Angle?

2. Tea Party Gov. Scott Walker Faces Recall: Those wishing to recall Tea Party Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker needed 700,000 signatures to put the recall in play. They collected over a million.

Walker rode the Tea Party wave into the Governor’s mansion in 2010, the same year the Tea Party driven GOP took over the House. Now Gov. Walker is staring straight into the face of political headwinds blowing hard in the opposite direction. Other Tea Governors continue to impress with historically low approval numbers. Swing state Govs. Rick Scott of Florida and John Kasich of Ohio are examples.

3. Congressional approval ratings: As the polls roll in it is crystal clear: the House is in the throes of their most unpopular period in at least 50 years. Congressional approval numbers were never anything to brag about. But when did they freefall to historic lows? In the eighth months the GOP Tea Party filled House fought over the debt ceiling. Everyone knows Congress is broken in an endless get-nothing-done cycle of gridlock. But the polls indicate who the public specifically blames: House Republicans. It was after the GOP won the majority in the House that congressional approval ratings hit their lowest point in American history.

4. Tea Candidates for the White House Tank: House Tea Party Caucus founder and Chair Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) only received 5% of the vote in Iowa and received 23,934 votes less than a Senator who lost his seat 6 years ago by 708,000 votes. The other Tea Party candidate, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, received 92,000 votes less than Mitt Romney and 40,000 less than moderate Jon Huntsman in the “live free or die” state.

5. Florida Tea Party Convention No-Shows : Not even Tea Party Florida Gov. Rick Scott attended the Florida Tea Party Convention in November 2011 – he cancelled last minute. Florida Tea Party hero Sen. Marco Rubio did the same. The 3-day convention had no high profile conservatives in attendance. Could this have happened in early 2010?

6. Capitulation and Defeat: Has “ObamaCare” been repealed? No. Did the Balance Budget Amendment pass? No. Did the Ryan Budget pass? No. In the midst of the payroll tax fight, the talking-loud-and-passing-nothing-into-law Tea Party members released statements like: “I am disappointed that our Republican leadership in both the House and Senate chose a course of political expediency rather than standing on conservative principle.” More importantly: The Tea Party has failed to find a way to leverage power and move legislation through both the House and the Senate and onto the President’s desk. Even Newt Gingrich figured out a way to do that with a Democrat in the White House.

7. GOP Town Halls Disappear: In September 2011 there may have been more cops than constituents at House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s (R-VA) Richmond town hall. That town hall required an “invite.” Two hundred “uninvited” protesters appeared outside. Last April, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) discovered he couldn’t hold a town hall without police protection. A few cops by the door is one thing. Having to leave through a back door and being driven in a police car is another. That’s what happened to Ryan in April 2011 almost exactly a year after Congressional Democrats pushed through Health Care reform legislation. All the Tea Talk demanding public officials “listening to the people” has vanished.

8. Ohio voters repeal measure to stifle collective bargaining for public employees: Last November a move made by yet another over-reaching Tea Party governor, Ohio’s John Kasich, was repealed. Seven hundred thousand signatures were collected to get the measure on the ballot. Four hundred thousand public employees would have been denied the right to strike and collectively bargain had the measure become law.

9. Remember all those big rallies? September 12, 2009 anyone? The massive November 5, 2009 rally in Washington D.C. to protest the health care bill? The people around the Capitol the week of March 14th during the final week of debate on health care reform? Where is all that now?

10. The House Tea Party “One and Done” List Lengthens: Remember the names of Reps. Blake Farenthold, Joe Walsh, Robert Dold, Bobby Schilling, Adam Kinzinger and Allen West. Refer back to this list again in January 2013 and ask yourself: How many of these people are still in Congress.

  Permalink | A A A
New Hampshire Slams tea party!!!
Posted by: SayNoToTea, 9. tammikuuta 2012 klo 17:14 (GMT) +5
The tea party needs to learn there are consequences for their actions. In New Hapshire they are learning just that. A state where they were more popular than most, but having their elected candidate become mired in scandal after scandal showed most New Hamshirens just excactly who and what the tea party nreally is, more crooked American politics at its worst, filled with dupes who think they are making a change by waving placards and signs.

(Spathy, the tea party actions speak so much louder than your attempts to justify your support of them because they stand for smaller governement. Across the aisle of Democrat and Republican, conservative or liberal, except for politicians people share the theme of a limited government. It's not exclusive of the tea party. Our arguments are where to institute the limits and at what point to draw the line. I'm sure if I sat down with your nemesis, Patrap, that he and I would disagree more than agree on lines and limits, however I welcome his posts as they are subtle illustrations of his beliefs, not the do it my way or the highway as your posts are.)
Why New Hampshire Republicans have turned away from the tea party
By Felicia Sonmez
MANCHESTER, N.H. – What a difference a year makes.


An overflow crowd attends a town hall with former senator Rick Santorum in Hollis, N.H. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)Fourteen months ago, the tea party swept the Granite State in the 2010 midterms, as more than four in 10 of those who went to the polls expressed support for the burgeoning movement. The sweep propelled new candidates, such as Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R) and Rep. Frank Guinta, (R) on to big wins.

Two months later, the New Hampshire Republican State Committee elected as its party chairman Jack Kimball, a tea party-backed businessman with no political experience who bested establishment candidate Juliana Bergeron in an upset win.

Now, on the eve of this election year’s first-in-the-nation presidential primary, the tea party’s influence on the GOP is unmistakably on the wane. Kimball is out after a rocky seven months at the helm; Guinta likely faces a tough reelection bid; and – most ominous-- for the first time more than 50 percent of likely GOP voters in New Hampshire say that they do not support the smaller-government, anti-tax movement.

What happened?

As is often the case in politics, the answer is a mix of national and local.

Nationally, the public’s views of the tea party have been cooling for the better part of a year. A November Pew Research Center survey showed that during the 2010 midterms, 27 percent of Americans said they agreed with the tea party, while 22 percent disagreed. A year later, those numbers were nearly reversed: 27 percent said they disagreed with the movement, while 20 percent said they agreed. More than half of respondents said they had no opinion.

Those numbers are reflected in the most recent polls of likely New Hampshire GOP primary voters.

An NBC News/Marist poll released late Friday showed that for the first time, 53 percent of likely Republican primary voters said they are not supporters of the tea party, while 40 percent said they are supporters and seven percent were unsure.

That was an uptick in opposition to the movement from October, when 47 percent of likely voters said they did not support the tea party, 42 percent said they did support it and nine percent were undecided.

The latest Suffolk University/7 News tracking poll shows an even more drastic shift.

In mid-September, 48 percent of likely Republican primary voters polled by Suffolk University described themselves as supporters of the tea party, while 40 percent said they were not, and 12 percent were undecided.

Now, in the latest tracking poll, support for the movement has plummeted 11 points – from 48 percent to 37 percent of likely GOP primary voters. Opposition has risen four points, from 40 percent to 44 percent. Nineteen percent are undecided.

While the drop in support for the tea party in New Hampshire dovetails with national trends, not all early states are seeing a similar decline. In fact, in two states with a conservative-leaning GOP electorate – Iowa and South Carolina – support has held steady or been rising in recent months.

In Iowa, which held its caucuses last week, 64 percent of those who voted were tea-party supporters, according to exit polls. Twenty-four percent described themselves as neutral, and 10 percent said they opposed the tea party.

That’s on par with the 65 percent of likely Iowa GOP caucus-goers in a July Mason-Dixon poll who said the phrase “tea party supporter” described them “very well” or “somewhat well.”

And in South Carolina, an early December NBC News/Marist poll shows support for the tea party stands at 51 percent among likely GOP primary voters, while 40 percent say they do not back the movement, and nine percent are unsure.

That’s actually an increase in support from October, when 45 percent of likely GOP voters in South Carolina said they backed the tea party, 44 percent said they did not, and 10 percent were unsure.

There’s another possible explanation for why the tea party has been losing favor in New Hampshire: the state’s local politics, particularly when it comes to the New Hampshire Republican Party chairmanship.

In January 2010, Kimball l eked out a narrow 222-to-199 win among members of the state Republican Committee in the chairmanship race. But his tenure at the party helm was quickly beset by allegations of corruption and incompetence.

As pressure mounted from within his own party to resign – including from Ayotte, Guinta and others who rode the 2010 tea party wave -- Kimball defiantly declared that he would not step down. He then reversed course a few days later, and Wayne MacDonald, then the party’s vice chairman, stepped into the chairmanship.

The episode may have served as a cautionary tale of the challenges that come with elevating a tea party-backed newcomer to political office. MacDonald, has a resume that contrasts sharply with Kimball’s: His biography on the New Hampshire Republican Party Web site notes that he has “political experience spanning more than three decades” and has served “at every level” in the state committee.

What does it all mean for Tuesday’s primary?

It’s the latest explanation for why former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (R) is going from strength to strength in the Granite State.

The Iowa exit polls show that tea party supporters were fractured in last week’s caucuses: 29 percent backed former senator Rick Santorum, while 19 percent backed Rep. Ron Paul (Texas); 19 percent backed Romney; 15 percent supported former House speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.); and 11 percent voted for former Texas Gov. Rick Perry.

Tea party opponents, however, were far more unified: 43 percent of them voted for Romney. A plurality of those who said they were neutral about the tea party also voted for Romney -- he took 32 percent.

So, the fewer likely GOP primary voters in New Hampshire who say the support the tea party, the better the odds are for Romney.

In a sign that tea party supporters in the Granite State are also unlikely to rally behind a single candidate on primary day, Guinta has said that he is declining to endorse a particular candidate.

And, notably, Paul – who has been hailed as a congressman who was “tea party before there was a tea party” – has been buoyed more by young voters (he won 48 percent of 17- to-29-year-olds in Iowa) than by tea party backers. Some of his most ardent fans in the Granite State were chagrined about the slack in tea party support over the weekend.

“Ron Paul is the founding father of the tea party. Don’t call yourself a tea party and then spit on the guy that started it,” Glen Aldrich, a 54-year-old unemployed carpenter from Guilford, said as he stood outside of Paul’s Sunday event in Meredith rounding up support for the candidate.

Aldrich noted that last month, the Lakes Region Tea Party, which meets just down the street from where Paul’s event was held, backed Gingrich in an informal straw poll of its members. Seventeen members backed Gingrich; 12 members cast ballots for Romney; only three voted for Paul.

“Wow,” Aldrich said of his reaction to the poll results. “I said, ‘No reason for me to go there. Ain’t too many people think like I do.’ I considered myself a tea-partier until then.”



  Permalink | A A A
More tea party Lies
Posted by: SayNoToTea, 6. tammikuuta 2012 klo 21:17 (GMT) +3
First let me state that our limits of checks and balances for each branch of our government were created for a reason and as such should be upheld at all reasonable costs. With that besing said read the tea party blog and then research a few facts. It will take you all of ten seconds and then ask yourself, if what they say is true, then it must have been true for everyone who has perpetrated the same misdeed and it must be more so true for those that have done the same misdeed many times more. Then ask yourself, why would someone expect you to read their lies and be too stupid to not dig just a bit and see them for the liar they are? Answer, they think you are even stupider than they themselves are. Have a great weekend.


Senate Appointments Bypassing Congress

According to the Congressional Research Service, Ronald Reagan made 240 recess appointments in 8 years (30 per year), George H. W. Bush made 77 in 4 years (19.25 per), Bill Clinton made 140 in 8 years (17.5 per) and George W. Bush made 171 in 8 years (21 per). In the last three years, President Obama has made 28 recess appointments. That’s an average of 9.3 per year.

  Permalink | A A A
Iowa Slams Tea Party
Posted by: SayNoToTea, 4. tammikuuta 2012 klo 19:48 (GMT) +4
As a Republican who does not want the tea party dictating and controlling the Republican Party let me thank the great people of Iowa. Not only did they show that most Americans also do not align themselves with the tea party, two of the tea party twits have closed up shop and ran for the hills with their tails between their legs. Goodbye Perry and Bachman, may we not hear of you two again. Iowa said Newt who, as he could only garner 16 percent of the popular vote. Now on to New Hampshire where we can only hope we can say adieu to Newt and hopefully we'll hear a lot more from Huntsman.
  Permalink | A A A
About SayNoToTea
The tea party is is made up of puppets being run by an elite group to serve their needs and not the needs of the people